Item: GLPOneTelehealth
Rating: 91

Score breakdown · Provider-Selection Integrity rubric

Criterion	Awarded	Max	Rationale
Payment & affiliate disclosure	21	25	Disclosure inline. Entity-level partners identified. -4 for the state-page disclosure not being as granular as the homepage.
Provider-selection methodology	18	20	Six-Pillar framework applied with a state-coverage variant. -2 for the state-coverage criterion being applied editorially but not formally weighted in the published rubric.
Author E-E-A-T	17	20	Named MD reviewer. -3 for editor not consistently distinct from reviewer across all state-specific provider pages.
Provider verification rigor	13	15	State medical-board licensure verification is the audit's strongest single performance on Criterion 4-b: each recommended provider's prescribing physicians are checked against each claimed state's medical board. -2 for clinical-staff verification depth varying by state page.
Pricing transparency	10	10	Pricing verified per state. Dose-structure distinguished. Where pricing varies by state, the variance is documented.
Update cadence & corrections	12	10	Per-page state-page review dates. Corrections log linked. Capped at 10.
Total	91	100

Note: Criterion 6 effective performance scored at 12/10; capped at 10.

Editorial findings — strengths

State-by-state physician-licensure verification is the audit's gold-standard implementation of Criterion 4-b.
Coverage maps reflect verified prescribing authority, not asserted state presence from provider marketing.
Pricing variance across states (where present) is documented rather than averaged or hidden.

State-coverage criterion is applied editorially but not formally weighted in the published rubric.
Editor and reviewer are not consistently distinct across all state-specific provider pages.
Clinical-staff verification depth varies by state page.

Two-point discrepancy on Criterion 3. Below threshold. No adjudication. Final: 91/100. Signed off May 19, 2026.